Fastest yet most stable version of Linux?

Question

I'm running Ubuntu right now, i have run Fedora, Suse, Slax, Whax, Backtrack, Mandriva, Solaris, DVL, DSL, Helix, navynos, Feather, Gentoo, and Sabayon (all from Live DVD's) im just not sure which one is the fastest, nor have a i used them all enough to test the stability.

Answer 1

I've been using Fedora since Fedora Core 5 and its always rocked.

Answer 2

Debian stable has a huge reputation for stability. You realize that people criticize it because it is boring. That is really the same thing it is stable because it does not have the latest version of all the programs, it is very slow to adopt anything new (latest graphic cards, hyper threading, bluetooth, etc). They do not add new programs until they have been well tested and are rated bug free. Debian is very popular for server installations that want very few upgrades. Debian is very very slow to upgrade to a new version. Don't confuse debian stable with debian testing or unstable; those are for the people who want to run debian but live on the bleeding edge (and test the software for bugs and stability).



As far as speed since all versions of linux use the same kernel, apart from the hardware that a person is running I think speed comes from how the user configures the system. Which desktop, not installing a lot of software that runs in the background (distributed computing like folding @home, personal reminders and schedulers, rss feeds, screensavers, keep to a minimum the number of services that are running, etc). There are many article around that tell how to speed up you system but most people don't bother because they like the eye candy and don't want to slug through all those configuration files.

I have always believed that linux is all about choices and you can have the linux you want.

Good luck in your pursuit.

Answer 3

well something like Puppy or DSL is obviously gonna be the fastest since it doesn't run much in the background, but in terms of support and stability Fedora 10 wins my vote. Ubuntu is nice and easy to use, but it's not nearly as stable.

Answer 4

answer: One substantial distinction between Linux and domicile windows is that Linux tries to strengthen and restoration what it already has, the place domicile windows variations rebuild what they already have been given working and/or upload new stuff merely because of the fact they might. In different words, Linux has had 2 an prolonged time to stablize its middle whilst domicile windows 7 has had decrease than 5. it is be something in the event that they integrated WINE so as which you would be waiting to purely drop domicile windows courses in without flinching -- extremely make the greater convoluted utility like Photoshop a lot much less stressful to place in without hours of tweaks and hoop-leaping to get it in place. there is one tradeoff some human beings see and others do no longer: hardware makers artwork with Microsoft to get the final drivers in, whilst Linux builders could opposite engineer the domicile windows drivers or the hardware to make your innovations up a thank you to make drivers. some makers are greater advantageous approximately helping than others, yet i be attentive to on my device there's a splash bit a velocity hit whilst the workstation figures out a thank you to show issues because of the fact the video drivers are good, no longer great. very final answer: domicile windows XP has substitute into tremendously much good, yet a) they do no longer improve for it so they don't seem to be going to attempt for perfection, and b) MSFT is now on Win8 so opened a sparkling can of worms.