Which Linux OS would you prefer PCLOS ubuntu SUSE Fedora and why?

Question

Which Linux OS would you prefer PCLOS ubuntu SUSE Fedora and why?

Answer 1

No operating system is bug free.

Answer 2

because of the fact the backside gadget of Linux is in simple terms about an identical for all the different Linux accessible and application you could deploy is quite often an identical. the terrific is extremely debatable. What you pick Linux to do and what very own computing device environment you pick to run makes a distinction basically as a client determination. keep in mind once you're a gamer you will pick to keep living house windows and set it up twin boot. this type you have the terrific of the two structures. i individually like the distributions that are KDE that's analogous in seems to living house windows. For Ubuntu i individually like in simple terms precise 2.a million because of the fact that's cool. i chanced on Mint linux to be sturdy until eventually you initiate upgrading to extra present day variations, yet it fairly is because of the fact i exploit it on an older computing device. there is likewise one reported as debris that's good. Open Suse to me looks to lavatory down my working gadget. Fedora is valuable, yet I even have subjects with it recognizing my living house windows partitions. so some distance as powerful, Linux gets all it means from utilising the Linux console and not the very own computing device environment. powerful good factors are based on what you're speaking approximately. Linux can do issues living house windows can no longer even do effectively or no longer waiting to do by using way the working gadget is coded and written. Linux runs on the hardware point of the ccomputer you install it on.

Answer 3

There isn't a bug free OS anywhere. I prefer Ubuntu.

Answer 4

Linux Mint is the king end of discussion. PCLOS came close I grant you but was buggier and lacked features I need.

Answer 5

i started off with pclinuxos back in 2007 release. now i love linux mint. linux mint is ubuntu + bug fixes+ codecs / flash/ and java. the only downside of pclinuxos was that they never update their packages. they are always a release behind or so. linux mint however since its based on ubuntu has alooot more software ready for it. getdeb.net is just 1 example. i would go with debian based distro now over redhar/mandriva based because mainly of software availability. i dont have the time to start compiling my own stuff. alot more linux software out there recompiles into ubuntu .deb files and that is why i use linux mint. it has better drivers over ubuntu and relatively bug free. its the pclinuxos of ubuntu. just like pclinuxos is for mandriva.



happy linux days

raj

Answer 6

i have experince in using linux distro. such as Ubuntu 8.04,9.04.9.10& Latest Lucid Lynx 10.04,

Fedora 12, PCBSD 7.1 and 8.0, PCLINUXOS KDE 2009 and PCLINUXOS KDE2010,Linux mint 8.0.

Ubuntu9.04 and Lucid Lynx has kernel panicking which renders it useless. We have to us the recovery option in grub and is not bug free. Fedora also has kernel panicking and is not user friendly as ubuntu. PCBSD though stable is based on freebsd and is not that developed when compared to Linux. Linux mint is not meant for serious users. It is good for entertainment. PCLINUX OS 2009 booting was slow and takes lot of time in comparison to ubuntu. PCLINUXOS2010 is faster more stable and bug free as far as i am concerned. It has almost all codecs. It is also good for serious users and is more stable than the other operating systems. PCLOS has backward compatiblity and CDMA support for slow speed internet. Attraction for ubuntu is free distribution of cds and wide publicity by canonical where as PCLOS and PCBSD one has to take the pain of downloading and creating bootable Cd.It is worth taking that much pain.

Answer 7

I prefer either PCLOS or Fedora, for opposite reasons. As you have stated PCLOS is a stable release period. Also like Ubuntu and Linux Mint it is Debian-derived while avoiding the turf battles which drove me back to slackware. It's very forgiving in what hardware it uses, especially compared to Ubuntu post-Jaunty and Fedora.



Fedora is testing software period. No ifs ands or buts. If you must have the latest hardware driven to the max and straightforward tools then you too can test out Red Hat's next version of RHEL. If you want to use a version of Fedora which is stable, get CENTOS. Right now I have a live cd of Fedora 13 and Sugar on a Stick running on Fedora 12. Both can be pretty awesome but I'm not into the latest and greatest technology -- I still used Red hat primarily from 7 to 9 then Fedora 1 and tried again with Fedora Core 4 before switching to Debian for the hardware demands.



Then I finally learned to administer Slackware which I'd used as a user for about a decade at that point (on a public box). I respected Ubuntu until Karmic, though a Karmic live cd saved my bacon on a business trip, and I could be very rude about Suse since Novell bought it (not just for the obvious reasons but because of the makeover it got -- it used to be more KDE-centric and there are advantages to that even if Konqueror's only possible justification is the Webkit fork).



Everyone has their own demands and Slackware is not a beginner's distro -- it requires good or intermediate administration skills on a level where it doesn't matter what distro you start out with, but for advanced hardware, I would go with Fedora, while for my preferred hardware I'd go with PCLOS.

Answer 8

I like to recommend PCLinuxOS KDE for people new to Linux, so they are still using a familiar environment like Windows. I've played around with Ubuntu since Version4 came out, had it installed for awhile and changed to newer versions. The new one is quite an improvement, but there are quirks I really don't like. I like PCLinuxOS KDE, but the new KDE just isn't quite where it needs to be, there is simply too much missing.



I have 250 Linux CDs in my closet and have tried and ran everyone of them on different computer systems. Probably only six of those I would consider using on a computer. The biggest issue I have with Linux is repositories disappearing, simply because some computers can not run newer Linux versions. I am currently running the new Ubuntu, but not sure I will even keep it installed. I guess that is what Linux is all about, choices.



If Linux ever wants to take the market by storm, they need to consider creating software similar to what MAC creates, without crossing copyright infringement. I already know there is commercial software available. Don't get me wrong, I love Linux and don't want to be a Microsoft Hostage, but I do dual boot, so I have the best of both systems.

Answer 9

I agree no OS is bug free but if I really had to chose I would have to go with Ubuntu only because it's got the most light shining on it, not much advanced configurations but from what I gather about PCLinuxOS is it also has a user friendly environment. I don't have much experience with PCLOS but now that were talking about it. I'm going to download it right now. Short story being a Linux OS that's plug and play, with multimedia support, speed, security and stability as well as a user friendly environment that doesn't require much administration is what I look for. Take it for what it is you know?

Answer 10

As a program developer I need an OS that I can get up and running quickly and efficiently. For this reason alone I use Ubuntu (with Linux Mint packages added in). I've never tried PCLinuxOS but it is on my list of things to do when I have time off. Fedora I find is best when I have to work on PPC computers (my PS3 had Fedora till the latest system update (booerns Sony!!!)). I never really liked SUSE from the start (they rely to much on KDE which I hate (I'm a Gnome person, I don't think any less of KDE people, I just don't like it for myself)). For the most part Ubuntu just works for what I need it to do. I don't believe in corporate loyalty beyond the point where a group or corporation has earned it from me so if something comes along that is better then Ubuntu, I'll switch in a heart beat.

Answer 11

I started out with Linux in 2006 with Ubuntu 6.10 whilst Dual Booting with XP which is still the best Windows based operating system. In 2007 I converted entirely to Linux with Linux Mint 3.1 which was based upon Ubuntu 7.04 which in itself was a fine release.



I thoroughly recommend Linux Mint 8 Main Edition which is built upon Ubuntu 9.10 Its easy to install and easy to use plus it comes with much of the software you are likely to need preinstalled



Linux Mint 8 Download

http://www.linuxmint.com/edition.php?id=44



The Perfect Desktop - Linux Mint 8 (Helena) Installation

http://www.howtoforge.com/the-perfect-desktop-linux-mint-8-helena



Linux Mint 8 Helena User Guide

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23787138/Linux-Mint-8-Helena-User-Guide



You download the ISO. image of Linux Mint 8 then you need to create a Bootable LiveCD for installation



Linux Mint 8 can also be run direct from the LiveCD from Booting up without touching your Hard Drive





LUg.