Question:
if the mac operative system is unix based then?
anonymous
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
if the mac operative system is unix based then?
Ten answers:
Walter J
2008-07-19 13:13:51 UTC
Yep. But keep in mind your Mac software won't run on Linux, but then, with the WINE program, your Linux computer should run most Windows programs. I'm currently using Ubuntu Hardy Heron and it works just fine; I really like it.
anonymous
2016-04-11 09:00:49 UTC
Windows didn't have a base like apple's os x's unix base, windows is coded in C++.
freebsd-unix.sg
2008-07-20 00:07:05 UTC
You are somewhat correct

But many people want idiot-proof configuration they want a point and click system without any trouble

Sure you can argue Ubuntu is already idiot proof but sometimes due to an inconsistent change in software some software might 'break'

Ubuntu is not maintained as a OS in a whole because the Kernel belongs to Linus Torvald while GNU software is maintained separately

Ubuntu tries to maintain the OS as a whole but things happen especially when you want all cutting edge software



But there is another alternative FreeBSD which is maintained as an OS as a whole but it is not desgined to be idiot-proof but it less cutting edge PC-BSD is you can try it out
Solar Granulation
2008-07-19 13:36:30 UTC
While Mac OS is Unix based (Apple having ceased to design their own kernels some time ago) this is not the same as being a Linux system. Unix is non-open source. Linux is a Unix-like, open source kernel. It does not use Unix code, but its methods of operation are very similar.



Because Unix is non-OSS, Mac OS is very much a 'proprietary' system. Linux distros are far more open.



You are correct, however, that it would be easier and cheaper to use Linux. You can even make Linux look like Mac. However, Macintosh software will not run under Linux.
Linux Mint 11
2008-07-19 13:26:22 UTC
You are quite correct when you say your MAC is UNIX based, however UNIX and Linux are not the same.



Taken from http://www.dwheeler.com/secure-programs/Secure-Programs-HOWTO/history.html



UNIX

In 1969-1970, Kenneth Thompson, Dennis Ritchie, and others at AT&T Bell Labs began developing a small operating system on a little-used PDP-7. The operating system was soon christened Unix, a pun on an earlier operating system project called MULTICS. In 1972-1973 the system was rewritten in the programming language C, an unusual step that was visionary: due to this decision, Unix was the first widely-used operating system that could switch from and outlive its original hardware. Other innovations were added to Unix as well, in part due to synergies between Bell Labs and the academic community. In 1979, the ``seventh edition'' (V7) version of Unix was released, the grandfather of all extant Unix systems.



After this point, the history of Unix becomes somewhat convoluted. The academic community, led by Berkeley, developed a variant called the Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD), while AT&T continued developing Unix under the names ``System III'' and later ``System V''. In the late 1980's through early 1990's the ``wars'' between these two major strains raged. After many years each variant adopted many of the key features of the other. Commercially, System V won the ``standards wars'' (getting most of its interfaces into the formal standards), and most hardware vendors switched to AT&T's System V. However, System V ended up incorporating many BSD innovations, so the resulting system was more a merger of the two branches. The BSD branch did not die, but instead became widely used for research, for PC hardware, and for single-purpose servers (e.g., many web sites use a BSD derivative).



The result was many different versions of Unix, all based on the original seventh edition. Most versions of Unix were proprietary and maintained by their respective hardware vendor, for example, Sun Solaris is a variant of System V. Three versions of the BSD branch of Unix ended up as open source: FreeBSD (concentrating on ease-of-installation for PC-type hardware), NetBSD (concentrating on many different CPU architectures), and a variant of NetBSD, OpenBSD (concentrating on security). More general information about Unix history can be found at http://www.datametrics.com/tech/unix/uxhistry/brf-hist.htm, http://perso.wanadoo.fr/levenez/unix, and http://www.crackmonkey.org/unix.html. Much more information about the BSD history can be found in [McKusick 1999] and ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/src/share/misc/bsd-family-tree.



A slightly old but interesting advocacy piece that presents arguments for using Unix-like systems (instead of Microsoft's products) is John Kirch's paper ``Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 versus UNIX''.



LINUX

In 1991 Linus Torvalds began developing an operating system kernel, which he named ``Linux'' [Torvalds 1999]. This kernel could be combined with the FSF material and other components (in particular some of the BSD components and MIT's X-windows software) to produce a freely-modifiable and very useful operating system. This book will term the kernel itself the ``Linux kernel'' and an entire combination as ``Linux''. Note that many use the term ``GNU/Linux'' instead for this combination.



In the Linux community, different organizations have combined the available components differently. Each combination is called a ``distribution'', and the organizations that develop distributions are called ``distributors''. Common distributions include Red Hat, Mandrake, SuSE, Caldera, Corel, and Debian. There are differences between the various distributions, but all distributions are based on the same foundation: the Linux kernel and the GNU glibc libraries. Since both are covered by ``copyleft'' style licenses, changes to these foundations generally must be made available to all, a unifying force between the Linux distributions at their foundation that does not exist between the BSD and AT&T-derived Unix systems. This book is not specific to any Linux distribution; when it discusses Linux it presumes Linux kernel version 2.2 or greater and the C library glibc 2.1 or greater, valid assumptions for essentially all current major Linux distributions.



As to your question as to would it be cheaper, not necessarily so using the DELL & Ubuntu as an example.

It shows in general that there is no appreciable difference as DELL claim that it takes more man hours to configure their hardware to run Ubuntu, which I hasten to add I question.



The best way to get Linux is if you are buying a PC, buy one with no operating system installed then install the Linux of your choice.



LUg.
cuban100
2008-07-19 13:19:39 UTC
Mac and Linux are both based on Unix, but both are completely different codes so what runs on Linux will not run on Mac and vice verse, and yes the cheaper PC you could get right now is the one with Linux OS pre-installed on it. On of most popular linux flavor is Ubuntu.
anonymous
2008-07-19 13:19:37 UTC
OSX is Unix based, Linux is also Unix based. That's all the two have in common other than being awesome.

No, OSX is not based in any way off of Linux.
megasparks0101
2008-07-19 13:12:33 UTC
key word "Kind of" linux was written off of unix, (sorta) anyways osx or whatever version is written to work only with certin hardware.
davlin111
2008-07-19 13:11:43 UTC
mack is not unix baced thats a lie whoever told you that. it is and yess it would be cheaperjust to get linux and mod it so it loks like mak and plays mak programs . its cheeper it runs quike and its just an all over better os.
Daniel da Silva
2008-07-19 13:34:29 UTC
Contrary to what another responder said, the Mac OS X is indeed a Unix based operating system. You can read more about it here:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_os_x



And yes, it certainly is a lot cheaper to buy a non Apple PC and run Linux on it. A disadvantage of that is that you wouldn't be able to run big name proprietary software such as Adobe Photoshop and so on. But the Open Source community is vast and you can find equally powerful Open Source applications with ease, and for free. GIMP, for example, is a very powerful free alternative to Photoshop.



Mac PCs are nothing more than regular PCs that are sold by Apple in which you are allowed to run OS X on them legally. And because you can only run OS X on hardware provided by Apple, they tend to overprice their equipment, as Apple's profits are mostly on the sale of hardware, not software.



Don't get me wrong, I believe OS X is a great operating system, better and easier to use than Windows. But to me, the appeal of it is very much diminished because it is hardware locked. It would be great if I could build my own machine, buy a copy of OS X Leopard and run on it. Unfortunately, that is not possible (at least not legally).



It wouldn't be much cheaper if you bought a pre-built machine that comes with Windows and then installed Linux on it, as you're paying the Windows fee on it and you're not even gonna be using it. Better would be to buy an OS-less machine, or better yet, if you have some experience, to build a machine from scratch and install Linux on it.



Keep in mind though that Linux and Unix are not the same thing. Linux is an Unix-like OS. That way, the OS X and a Linux distro are not compatible, you will not be able to run an OS X application in your Linux box.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...