i understand the concept of a rolling release. But i am Not sold on it. i personally Feel that Rolling releases have the potential to be less stable and More problematic then a standard release. two examples of this are two Distros that i use. openSUSE and Pardus. Suse is a rolling release. i have problems with dependencies Randomly breaking all the time and Repositories changing at random so i have to Let yast do Vender changes on the Repos. it can become a very stupid issue to have to deal with. it can be a pain. Pardus is Slow to keep up with all the new Features and software that Linux has to offer. they are just now getting around to releasing KDE 4.6 on their Distro come But i feel that their 4.6 release will be More stable then openSUSE because they have been working on it for the last 6 Months in With universities and developers in Turkey. in a rolling release like openSUSE the bugs are the end users Problem to Deal With until somebody makes a Fix. at least that's how i assume it works. So when it comes to a system that you will Set up For somebody else that will run Linux Full time wouldn't a Standard non rolling release release be a better option because of the less likely change of Bugs and stuff? or am i totally wrong?