Question:
In your opinion which is better Mac OS X or Linux?
?
2010-03-13 05:28:42 UTC
I want deep answers, which means do not state an answer without proof or a good point. I am just wondering how people feel about them against each other. If you want to use a specific distro for Linux choose either Ubuntu, Mandriva, Slaxware, and Fedora. Please try hard to make a long post.
Twelve answers:
Brian F
2010-03-13 06:03:25 UTC
I personally would not own an Apple product of any kind, due to their "need" to keep everything closed/proprietary and tightly controlled by the company, locking you into THEIR solutions. This is for every product they own.



Apple is a "design" company, not an innovative company. OSX is based *directly* on BSD, which is Unix, and very close cousin to Linux. Mac took the entire BSD code, added their "pretties" to the interface, and locked it down. (BSD is open-source, so it was perfectly legal for them to do this.) Apple chose BSD over Linux as the base, because of a significant difference in the licensing of BSD vs. Linux. If they had chosen Linux as their base, they would have had to "contribute back" to the LInux community any changes they made to the OS. With BSD, they could take all they wanted, and did not have to "return" anything to the community. Again, this is perfectly legal, so they did nothing "technically wrong" in doing so.



Linux is a sharing community. When you make a change to a program on a GPL program (GNU Public LIcense) you have to share the code with anyone you distribute your program that was changed, so everyone benefits from your work, just as you benefited from the hard work of the thousands and thousands of developers who wrote the programs you are using. (You can make all the changes you want for personal/company use without having to release your code and changes, as long as the program is not sold or distributed to others.)



As to which distro...



If you want headaches and PITA updates, go for a slackware distro. Mandriva has had lots of problems with updates and version updates in the past. Fedora is so-so, not a favorite of mine - way too tightly tied to what redhat wants in their commercial version - it's just a testing ground for the RHL releases.



Ubuntu is decent. It's a joke that the word Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning "I could not get Debian to install on my hardware." There is a lot of truth to this, especially in the past.



Ubuntu tries to keep their distro "pure" in the "Open Source Spirit" by not including apps (and more importantly drivers.) that are not fully open source. This can lead to some difficulties installing certain wireless network cards, video cards and such. There is no reason you, as the end user, can not get the proprietary drivers and firmwares for these devices, they just are not included by default in the distro. Also things like multimedia codecs are not in the main distro, and the easiest way to add them is to add debian-multimedia.org into your repositories. Debian doesn't care that you add them, and even have FAQs to help you, they just refuse to include them in their own sources.



Debian (the main distro) tends to be *very* stable, but that also means slow to get the newest versions of programs. You have the option of using Debian "testing" or Debian SID (also called unstable") where all the newest cutting-edge versions of programs are first released. (SID is the character in Toy Story who like to break things. All Debian releases are named after Toy Story characters.)



If you want the cutting edge, but a little more stability, I would suggest checking out the Sidux distro.

It has several advantages over other distros in that it is a "rolling release". (Gentoo and a few other lesser-known distros are also "rolling releases")



In a Rolling Release distro there are no "version numbers" per-say. Yes, they release a few new versions every year to keep up with new hardware so that installations go smooth, but when you do an "update" on the system, you are always at the most current level. It doesn't matter if you downloaded a version from 2 years ago, or downloaded it today, once you do an "apt-get update", "apt-get dist-upgrade", both systems will be at exactly the same version. You might call it "version TODAY".



You never have to wait for the next release of the distro like 10.04, 10.10, 11.04 like Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva etc.



Sidux is based on Debian SID (very cutting edge) but each package added to SID is evaluated for stability first, and either modified by the Sidux team, or "held back" for a week or two to make sure your system will be stable before it is released. Once a package becomes stable in SID, then the official Debian release replaces the Sidux package, so it is always fully "binary compatible" with Debian.



The easiest way to update, install tweaks, etc. for Sidux is go to smxi.org and follow the directions to download and install the smxi script. Just run smxi as root (or sudo smxi) from a command prompt in Sidux and it will manage your updates for you.



Sidux is also *extremely* fast to install, making it very good for things like virtualization. A complete Sidux install, once you have your hard drive partitioned and formatted (which depending on your experience level can take 2 to 10 minutes), takes anywhere from 4 1/2 minutes to 6 minutes, depending on y
Hex
2010-03-13 05:35:35 UTC
I for one, dislike Unix. So I'm going with Linux.



Why?

When I'm dealing with different types of software I need to be able

to debug and handle multiple platforms in one environment. On a

Mac I barely have any flexibility when using WINE or similar

emulators. Also the stock permissions are so tight that having

complete root access ( aside from using sudo ) is a pain in the

a$$.



Macs also come with a lot of visual effects that bog down the machine.

With Linux you can have the same effects with higher customization

and not lose a single bit of performance. Lastly, I run a data server.

If I even thought for a second that Mac/Unix would have been the best

choice then I probably would have shot myself. Everything is a damn

file on Unix and this makes pipelining so hard sometimes. Especially

when you have certified servers sending packets to you and most

of them are denied due to stupid permissions problems in the headers!

Even when it's from the same IP address!



*sighs*

But yea. My 2 cents.





- Hex
O
2010-03-13 05:30:03 UTC
Everything is better then Mac.
TBRMInsanity
2010-03-14 12:31:04 UTC
I really think it depends on what your doing with your computer. That being said if your going to use an Apple computer you really shouldn't be using any other OS besides Mac OS X. Mac OS X was designed for Apple hardware and as such it will always be the best Operating System to use on an Apple. I will always use Linux over Mac OS X because I'm a programmer and I need access to all the tools necessary to program at the lowest cost possible. The other advantage to myself is there are more Open Source projects on Linux then any other platform. This allows me to keep my programming skills up.
2010-03-13 11:10:30 UTC
The only difference you will get from a MAC compared to Linux is the software they write and software written for it. The underlying operating system is Unix enhanced with other operating systems embedded into it.



Everything is written for Windows so it is basically unlimited to a certain degree, which also means third party software will tend to make it crash more often. For gaming, Windows is still dominant.



MAC and Linux are stable, fairly secure and reliable. Updateing doesn't normally crash the operating system, but is can and does once in awhile. OS X is not easy to install on a computer that isn't a MAC. The disk will install propritery hardware drivers which may cause issues. Trying to install OS X86 is a pain in the neck.



I run all six computers dual boot, Windows and Linux. But I use Linux 95% of the time. I use PCLinuxOS KDE because it is comfortable to use. It is based on Mandriva. It's just easier to use and demonstrate Linux to people who have never seen it or used it.



On the Humor side: "Don't Be A Microsoft Hostage!"
Linux Mint 11
2010-03-13 05:58:20 UTC
Why Linux Is Better

http://www.whylinuxisbetter.net/



Here are some options for installing or trying out Linux



Option One (Full installation)



I thoroughly recommend Linux Mint 8 Main Edition which is built upon Ubuntu 9.10 Its easy to install and easy to use plus it comes with much of the software you are likely to need preinstalled



Linux Mint 8 Download

http://www.linuxmint.com/edition.php?id=44



The Perfect Desktop - Linux Mint 8 (Helena) Installation

http://www.howtoforge.com/the-perfect-desktop-linux-mint-8-helena



Linux Mint 8 Helena User Guide

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23787138/Linux-Mint-8-Helena-User-Guide



You download the ISO. image of Linux Mint 8 then you need to create a Bootable LiveCD for installation



Linux Mint 8 can also be run direct from the LiveCD from Booting up without touching your Hard Drive



Option Two (Install Ubuntu inside Windows XP and Vista)



Installing Ubuntu as a dual-boot with Windows without partitioning

http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/wubi



You keep Windows as it is, Wubi only adds an extra option to boot into Ubuntu. Wubi does not require you to modify the partitions of your PC, or to use a different bootloader, and does not install special drivers. It works just like any other application.



Wubi keeps most of the files in one folder, and if you do not like it, you can simply uninstall it as any other application.



Boot in to windows insert the Ubuntu 9.10 LiveCD and you will offered the option of installing inside windows which is where the Wubi installer comes in, you will be asked how many gigabytes you wish to allocate to Ubuntu (I recommend 8gb) then you set a password for your installation then click install and thats it.



Once Ubuntu is fully installed upon starting your PC you will be given a choice of which operating system you want to use Windows or Ubuntu



Ubuntu 9.10 Download

http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download



Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic Koala) User Guide

http://ubuntuguide.org/wiki/Ubuntu:Karmic



Linux Mint 7 has a similar feature called mint4win and the directions given above for Wubi can be followed (mint4win is not available for Linux Mint 8)

http://www.linuxmint.com/edition.php?id=38



Linux Mint 7 Download

http://www.linuxmint.com/edition.php?id=38



Linux Mint 7 Gloria User Guide

http://www.scribd.com/doc/15884753/Linux-Mint-7-Gloria-User-Guide



Ubuntu 9.10 and Linux Mint 7 can also be run straight from the LiveCD without touching your Hard drive



Option Three (LiveCD)



Here the possibilities are endless as you can try out as many different Linux distros. until you find the one thats right for you DISTROWATCH.COM gives full listings (second lists the major distributions)

http://distrowatch.com/



Major Linux Distributions

http://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=major





LUg.
2010-03-13 05:41:53 UTC
I think they're both good but you can't compare OS X to Linux. They have very much differences between each other. It also depends on what you want to use each other on. The Linux OS has few programs compatible with it and it's dumb... also it is harder to use than the Mac OS (just my opinion).



Only you can decide which is better for you or not.



I haven't really tried any of them. I'm a PC user for good years and I think I'm going to get a MacBook soon with Mac OS X preinstalled. The best part is that Macs can run Windows too, and that is wonderful in some cases. I have an Ubuntu CD which I loaded on my old laptop but it feels so hard to use it. Lol
ELfaGeek
2010-03-13 05:43:50 UTC
Maybe you should just do a Google search for:



compare OS X to Ubuntu



Then, repeat for other Linux Distros.



Then, after YOU have done all of your own research, AND you still have questions, we'd be happy to help.



TIP: (rant/) We only "choose to do long posts" when the Asker has shown us that they have "tried to do their own homework, FIRST" (and never when ORDERED to do so, ever). In other words, "play nice with us, and, we'll play nice with you". (/end rant)
Roy
2010-03-13 05:34:55 UTC
I've been a Windows user for 15 years and a Mac user for around 3 years. Wish I had shifted to Mac much earlier as the pain and expenses with a Windows system was terrible.



I find Mac more user-friendly than Linux, so right now, I'm a Mac fan.
John S
2010-03-13 05:33:49 UTC
we cant write essay for u with long ans, but Linux is better, as long u good in configuring it
Navin
2010-03-13 05:35:05 UTC
I used to have a PC with Ubuntu on it. I used to for a year or so, and although I liked it better than windows, there were some problems. First was that there were no really good games. I could use a windows emulator for games, but it kinda blew the point. Other programs are not first rate, they lag behind those available for other operating systems. Second was the lack of support for dual monitors. Third was the smooth streaming of flash videos. I found these all to be problems, I don't know if they have since been fixed, but I would suspect not. Linux is a great operating system, but these few problems really bugged me.



Now I have a Mac. I use OS X 10.6. I couldn't be happier. There are plenty of great games and other programs. I haven't had any problems there. Functionality is super easy and really quite innovative, like their magic mouse for example. I haven't had a crash, freeze, or break in the operating of my computer. It's pretty great.



So I would suggest getting a Mac. I'm not a fanboy, just someone who was converted over after trying everything else. They really make a good computer!
2010-03-13 05:32:16 UTC
Mac. Definitely mac.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...